>Exámenes selectividad inglés Cataluña resueltos
This is the premise behind “degrowth,” a new trend in political, social and economic thinking which questions consumerism as the basis of our society and suggests a new way of looking at wealth, basing it not on material goods and the creation of artificial needs but rather focusing on simplicity. The moral question of whether it is fair that 20% of the world’s population should have 80% of its wealth is only part of the degrowth equation. Another fundamental question is that of survival; that an economic model such as ours, based on constant growth, is not compatible with the planet’s finite resources. The resources we have at our disposal are limited and, the argument goes, if we do not stop plundering them they will inevitably run out.
“We can clearly see that the current system is unsustainable and if we carry on this way it will be disastrous,” says Santiago Vilanova, president of the association Una Sola Terra, which organised an international symposium in Barcelona in December 2006—the first intellectual and political debate in Catalonia about degrowth. And he insists: “Put another way, growth and the accumulation of wealth are not equivalent to well-being, quite the opposite, in fact.” Arnau Montserrat, a member of the Xarxa pel Decreixement, a group of individuals and organisations already working with these ideas, says that “we have been sold the idea that progress is only linked to growth. Obviously not all growth is bad but the sort we are talking about has nothing to do with personal growth, community links or public and social amenities, its only aim being the accumulation of money.”
It is easy to see degrowth as a utopian ideal and something very difficult to apply in practice.
However, for degrowth supporters now is the time for a change of mentality and this change does not necessarily have to be for the worse. “We’ll be happier if we work fewer hours and have more free time, we’ll socialise more and we can do without piles of consumer goods that we have no need for,” explains Carlos Taibo, a professor of political science at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. “Hyper-consumerism in our societies is an indicator of unhappiness, not happiness. You just need to look at the data showing the growing numbers of Americans saying they are unhappy—three times greater than those who express contentment, which is very surprising considering that income per head in the United States has multiplied by three since the end of the Second World War,” he adds.
“We can clearly see that the current system is unsustainable and if we carry on this way it will be disastrous,” says Santiago Vilanova, president of the association Una Sola Terra, which organised an international symposium in Barcelona in December 2006—the first intellectual and political debate in Catalonia about degrowth. And he insists: “Put another way, growth and the accumulation of wealth are not equivalent to well-being, quite the opposite, in fact.” Arnau Montserrat, a member of the Xarxa pel Decreixement, a group of individuals and organisations already working with these ideas, says that “we have been sold the idea that progress is only linked to growth. Obviously not all growth is bad but the sort we are talking about has nothing to do with personal growth, community links or public and social amenities, its only aim being the accumulation of money.”
It is easy to see degrowth as a utopian ideal and something very difficult to apply in practice.
However, for degrowth supporters now is the time for a change of mentality and this change does not necessarily have to be for the worse. “We’ll be happier if we work fewer hours and have more free time, we’ll socialise more and we can do without piles of consumer goods that we have no need for,” explains Carlos Taibo, a professor of political science at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. “Hyper-consumerism in our societies is an indicator of unhappiness, not happiness. You just need to look at the data showing the growing numbers of Americans saying they are unhappy—three times greater than those who express contentment, which is very surprising considering that income per head in the United States has multiplied by three since the end of the Second World War,” he adds.
Text adapted from Catalonia Today
- shift: canvi / cambio
- growth: creixement / crecimiento
- depletion: reducció, esgotament / reducción, agotamiento
- to halt: aturar / detener
- to plunder: abusar / abusar
- income: ingressos / ingresos
Reading comprehension
Choose the best answer according to the text. Only ONE answer is possible.1. According to the text, the health of the planet depends on…
- people eating better quality food.
- people eating more slowly.
- people consuming less than at present.
- people consuming less meat.
- way to study economics.
- way to create artificial needs.
- attitude concerning population growth.
- attitude concerning consumerism.
- surviving strategies.
- permanent growth.
- a few moral questions.
- the equal distribution of resources.
- might not be enough in the near future.
- are enough for 80 % of its population.
- are in the hands of 80 % of its population.
- might not be in good condition very soon.
- an international symposium should be organised in Barcelona every year.
- well-being cannot be considered a sustainable objective for humanity.
- the accumulation of wealth has to be excluded from political programmes.
- the well-being of people is not necessarily related to having more resources.
- progress is linked to growth.
- progress is slower than growth.
- progress does not depend only on growth.
- progress is faster than growth.
- always in favour of utopian ideals.
- usually good at practical things.
- always in favour of consumer goods.
- usually against working many hours.
- less happy now despite being richer.
- happier now than in the past decades.
- unhappy since the end of the Second World War.
- happy because of their growing income.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario